We are pleased to announce the publication of our chapter “Va.Si.Li-Lab: A Virtual Reality Solution for Applications in the Field of Educational and Social Science Technologies” in the edited volume “Digitale Learning Designs für die Hochschullehre gemeinschaftlich entwickeln“. Which has been a result of the DigiTeLL Project.
Patrick Schrottenbacher, Giuseppe Abrami, Mevlüt Bagci and Alexander Mehler. 2026.
Va.Si.Li-Lab: A Virtual Reality Solution for Applications in
the Field of Educational and Social Science Technologies. Digitale Learning Designs für die Hochschullehre gemeinschaftlich
entwickeln: Werkzeuge – Ressourcen – Szenarien, 212–229.
BibTeX
@incollection{Schrottenbacher:et:al:2026:b,
author = {Schrottenbacher, Patrick and Abrami, Giuseppe and Bagci, Mevl{\"u}t
and Mehler, Alexander},
title = {{Va.Si.Li-Lab}: A Virtual Reality Solution for Applications in
the Field of Educational and Social Science Technologies},
booktitle = {Digitale Learning Designs f{\"u}r die Hochschullehre gemeinschaftlich
entwickeln: Werkzeuge -- Ressourcen -- Szenarien},
editor = {Zeaiter, Sabrina and Stierwald, Mona},
publisher = {Waxmann},
year = {2026},
pages = {212--229},
doi = {10.31244/9783818851170}
}
We are pleased to inform you that the following papers have been accepted for presentation at KONVENS 2026, which will take place from September 14–17, 2026:
Mevlüt Bagci, Ali Abusaleh, Daniel Baumartz, Alexander Mehler, Giuseppe Abrami and Maxim Konca. 2026.
Extending a Parliamentary Corpus with MPs’ Tweets:
Automatic Annotation and Evaluation Using TTLABTWEETCORPUS. KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text.
accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{bagci:et:al:2026,
title = {Extending a Parliamentary Corpus with {MP}s{\textquoteright} Tweets:
Automatic Annotation and Evaluation Using {TTLABTWEETCORPUS}},
author = {Mevlüt Bagci and Ali Abusaleh and Daniel Baumartz and Alexander Mehler
and Giuseppe Abrami and Maxim Konca},
booktitle = {KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text},
year = {2026},
address = {Hamburg (Germany)},
keywords = {Corpora, Tweets, Political Data, Text, Media classification},
note = {accepted}
}
Christoph Wigbels, Ali Abusaleh, Markus T. Jansen, Alexander Mehler, Manuel Schaaf and Markus J. Hofmann. 2026.
Individual Text Corpora Predict User-Specific Knowledge: Benchmarks
of Individualized Knowledge Simulation. KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text.
accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Wigbels:et:al:2026:a,
author = {{Wigbels, Christoph and Abusaleh, Ali} and Jansen, Markus T. and Mehler, Alexander
and Schaaf, Manuel and Hofmann, Markus J.},
title = {Individual Text Corpora Predict User-Specific Knowledge: Benchmarks
of Individualized Knowledge Simulation},
booktitle = {KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text},
year = {2026},
address = {Hamburg (Germany)},
keywords = {Individual Text Corpora, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Personalized Language Models, Probabilistic Calibration, Knowledge Benchmarks, Data Contamination, German NLP, spp, circlet},
note = {accepted}
}
Leon Hammerla, Bhuvanesh Verma and Alexander Mehler. 2026.
RT-Seg: A Toolkit for Reasoning Trace Segmentation. KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text.
accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Hammerla:etal:2026:c,
title = {RT-Seg: A Toolkit for Reasoning Trace Segmentation},
author = {Leon Hammerla and Bhuvanesh Verma and Alexander Mehler},
booktitle = {KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text},
year = {2026},
address = {Hamburg (Germany)},
keywords = {neglab},
note = {accepted}
}
@inproceedings{Gombert:et:al:2026:a,
title = {Rubrics as Semantic Subspaces: A Unified Approach to Rubric-based
Constructed Response Scoring across Short Answers and Essays},
author = {Gombert, Sebastian and Hahn, Sonja and Andersen, Nico and Camus, Leon
and Sun, Zhifan and Nguyen, Ngoc Nhu Hao and Zehner, Fabian and Cong, Longwei
and Mehler, Alexander and Drachsler, Hendrik},
editor = {Kochmar, Ekaterina and Alhafni, Bashar and Bann{\`o}, Stefano
and Bexte, Marie and Burstein, Jill and Horbach, Andrea and Laarmann-Quante, Ronja
and Tack, Anais and Yaneva, Victoria and Yuan, Zheng},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Innovative Use of {NLP} for
Building Educational Applications ({BEA} 2026)},
month = {jul},
keywords = {core, core_c08},
year = {2026},
address = {San Diego, California, USA},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/2026.bea-1.44/},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2026.bea-1.44},
pages = {624--634},
isbn = {979-8-89176-409-5},
pdf = {https://aclanthology.org/2026.bea-1.44.pdf},
abstract = {Rubrics are the primary reference for manual scoring of constructed
responses, and there is growing interest in their use in automated
scoring methodologies. In this work, we propose Aspect-Grounded
Rubric{--}Answer Alignment (AGRAA), a rubric-based end-to-end
scoring framework that models rubric descriptors as latent aspect
spaces. Concretely, rubric descriptors are represented as low-dimensional
subspaces derived from contextualised transformer embeddings,
and student responses are scored according to how strongly their
representations align with these rubric-induced spaces relative
to the residual space outside them. This formulation provides
a geometrically grounded interpretation of rubric-based scoring
while enabling end-to-end training with standard transformer encoders.
We introduce three distinct architectural variants and evaluate
them on multiple short-answer and essay scoring datasets. Across
these tasks, AGRAA achieves predictive performance highly competitive
with strong neural and feature-based baselines. In addition, the
framework yields interpretable intermediate representations that
expose which rubric-defined aspects contribute to scoring decisions,
enabling decision-aligned explanations grounded in rubric descriptors.}
}
Sebastian Gombert, Gianluca Romano, Leon Camus, Daniel Baumartz, Fabiola Gonçalves Ribeiro, Alexander Mehler and Hendrik Drachsler. 2026.
NeoBridge: A Scalable Platform for Assessment Orchestration
and Log Data Collection in Online Reasoning Assessments. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Technology
Enhanced Learning.
accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Gombert:et:al:2026:b,
author = {Gombert, Sebastian and Romano, Gianluca and Camus, Leon and Baumartz, Daniel
and Gon{\c{c}}alves Ribeiro, Fabiola and Mehler, Alexander and Drachsler, Hendrik},
title = {{NeoBridge}: A Scalable Platform for Assessment Orchestration
and Log Data Collection in Online Reasoning Assessments},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Technology
Enhanced Learning},
series = {ECTEL 2026},
address = {Valencia, Spain},
year = {2026},
keywords = {core, core_c08},
eventdate = {2026-09-14/2026-09-18},
note = {accepted}
}
We are pleased to inform you that the following paper has been accepted at the 6th NALOMA (NAtural Language Meets LOgic and MAchine Learning) workshop, co-located with ESSLLI from August 3–7 in Prague.
@inproceedings{Hammerla:Mehler:2026:b,
title = {Negation in Reasoning Traces: Interpretable Signals of Correctness
and Provenance},
author = {Hammerla, Leon Lukas and Mehler, Alexander},
editor = {Yanaka, Hitomi and Abzianidze, Lasha},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Natural Language Meets Logic
and Machine Learning ({NALOMA})},
month = {aug},
year = {2026},
address = {Prague, Czechia},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/2026.naloma-1.4/},
pages = {19--39},
isbn = {979-8-89176-389-0},
abstract = {Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is widely used in large language
models (LLMs), but the resulting reasoning traces remain underexplored.We
study these traces through the lens of discourse-level negation.Specifically,
we distinguish between corrective negation, which rejects a prior
reasoning step, and refining negation, which narrows or qualifies
it, and introduce metrics to quantify their use in human- and
LLM-authored reasoning traces.Across multiple benchmarks, we find
that negation occurs much more frequently in intermediate reasoning
traces than in final response texts.We then test whether negation-based
features provide predictive and descriptive signal for correctness,
model identity, and human-vs.-LLM authorship.For correctness prediction,
negation-based features consistently outperform simple structural
baselines and in several settings add complementary signal to
embedding-based representations, although embeddings remain stronger
overall.In a controlled comparison on correct human and LLM traces
from the same dataset, our strongest results arise in human-vs.-LLM
classification, where negation features outperform both structural
and embedding baselines.Overall, these findings position discourse-level
negation as an interpretable feature for reasoning-trace analysis,
with especially strong utility for provenance-related classification
and modest but consistent value for correctness prediction.}
}