News

New Publication: Va.Si.Li-Lab in “Digitale Learning Designs”

We are pleased to announce the publication of our chapter “Va.Si.Li-Lab: A Virtual Reality Solution for Applications in the Field of Educational and Social Science Technologies” in the edited volume “Digitale Learning Designs für die Hochschullehre gemeinschaftlich entwickeln“. Which has been a result of the DigiTeLL Project.

Patrick Schrottenbacher, Giuseppe Abrami, Mevlüt Bagci and Alexander Mehler. 2026. Va.Si.Li-Lab: A Virtual Reality Solution for Applications in the Field of Educational and Social Science Technologies. Digitale Learning Designs für die Hochschullehre gemeinschaftlich entwickeln: Werkzeuge – Ressourcen – Szenarien, 212–229.
BibTeX
@incollection{Schrottenbacher:et:al:2026:b,
  author    = {Schrottenbacher, Patrick and Abrami, Giuseppe and Bagci, Mevl{\"u}t
               and Mehler, Alexander},
  title     = {{Va.Si.Li-Lab}: A Virtual Reality Solution for Applications in
               the Field of Educational and Social Science Technologies},
  booktitle = {Digitale Learning Designs f{\"u}r die Hochschullehre gemeinschaftlich
               entwickeln: Werkzeuge -- Ressourcen -- Szenarien},
  editor    = {Zeaiter, Sabrina and Stierwald, Mona},
  publisher = {Waxmann},
  year      = {2026},
  pages     = {212--229},
  doi       = {10.31244/9783818851170}
}

New publications at KONVENS 2026

We are pleased to inform you that the following papers have been accepted for presentation at KONVENS 2026, which will take place from September 14–17, 2026:

Mevlüt Bagci, Ali Abusaleh, Daniel Baumartz, Alexander Mehler, Giuseppe Abrami and Maxim Konca. 2026. Extending a Parliamentary Corpus with MPs’ Tweets: Automatic Annotation and Evaluation Using TTLABTWEETCORPUS. KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text. accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{bagci:et:al:2026,
  title     = {Extending a Parliamentary Corpus with {MP}s{\textquoteright} Tweets:
               Automatic Annotation and Evaluation Using {TTLABTWEETCORPUS}},
  author    = {Mevlüt Bagci and Ali Abusaleh and Daniel Baumartz and Alexander Mehler
               and Giuseppe Abrami and Maxim Konca},
  booktitle = {KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text},
  year      = {2026},
  address   = {Hamburg (Germany)},
  keywords  = {Corpora, Tweets, Political Data, Text, Media classification},
  note      = {accepted}
}

Christoph Wigbels, Ali Abusaleh, Markus T. Jansen, Alexander Mehler, Manuel Schaaf and Markus J. Hofmann. 2026. Individual Text Corpora Predict User-Specific Knowledge: Benchmarks of Individualized Knowledge Simulation. KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text. accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Wigbels:et:al:2026:a,
  author    = {{Wigbels, Christoph and Abusaleh, Ali} and Jansen, Markus T. and Mehler, Alexander
               and Schaaf, Manuel and Hofmann, Markus J.},
  title     = {Individual Text Corpora Predict User-Specific Knowledge: Benchmarks
               of Individualized Knowledge Simulation},
  booktitle = {KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text},
  year      = {2026},
  address   = {Hamburg (Germany)},
  keywords  = {Individual Text Corpora, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Personalized Language Models, Probabilistic Calibration, Knowledge Benchmarks, Data Contamination, German NLP, spp, circlet},
  note      = {accepted}
}

Leon Hammerla, Bhuvanesh Verma and Alexander Mehler. 2026. RT-Seg: A Toolkit for Reasoning Trace Segmentation. KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text. accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Hammerla:etal:2026:c,
  title     = {RT-Seg: A Toolkit for Reasoning Trace Segmentation},
  author    = {Leon Hammerla and Bhuvanesh Verma and Alexander Mehler},
  booktitle = {KONVENS 2026 - Context matters: NLP beyond Text},
  year      = {2026},
  address   = {Hamburg (Germany)},
  keywords  = {neglab},
  note      = {accepted}
}

New publications related to CORE C08

We are pleased to announce that the following articles have been accepted or have already been published:

Sebastian Gombert, Sonja Hahn, Nico Andersen, Leon Camus, Zhifan Sun, Ngoc Nhu Hao Nguyen, Fabian Zehner, Longwei Cong, Alexander Mehler and Hendrik Drachsler. July, 2026. Rubrics as Semantic Subspaces: A Unified Approach to Rubric-based Constructed Response Scoring across Short Answers and Essays. Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2026), 624–634.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Gombert:et:al:2026:a,
  title     = {Rubrics as Semantic Subspaces: A Unified Approach to Rubric-based
               Constructed Response Scoring across Short Answers and Essays},
  author    = {Gombert, Sebastian and Hahn, Sonja and Andersen, Nico and Camus, Leon
               and Sun, Zhifan and Nguyen, Ngoc Nhu Hao and Zehner, Fabian and Cong, Longwei
               and Mehler, Alexander and Drachsler, Hendrik},
  editor    = {Kochmar, Ekaterina and Alhafni, Bashar and Bann{\`o}, Stefano
               and Bexte, Marie and Burstein, Jill and Horbach, Andrea and Laarmann-Quante, Ronja
               and Tack, Anais and Yaneva, Victoria and Yuan, Zheng},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21st Workshop on Innovative Use of {NLP} for
               Building Educational Applications ({BEA} 2026)},
  month     = {jul},
  keywords  = {core, core_c08},
  year      = {2026},
  address   = {San Diego, California, USA},
  publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
  url       = {https://aclanthology.org/2026.bea-1.44/},
  doi       = {10.18653/v1/2026.bea-1.44},
  pages     = {624--634},
  isbn      = {979-8-89176-409-5},
  pdf       = {https://aclanthology.org/2026.bea-1.44.pdf},
  abstract  = {Rubrics are the primary reference for manual scoring of constructed
               responses, and there is growing interest in their use in automated
               scoring methodologies. In this work, we propose Aspect-Grounded
               Rubric{--}Answer Alignment (AGRAA), a rubric-based end-to-end
               scoring framework that models rubric descriptors as latent aspect
               spaces. Concretely, rubric descriptors are represented as low-dimensional
               subspaces derived from contextualised transformer embeddings,
               and student responses are scored according to how strongly their
               representations align with these rubric-induced spaces relative
               to the residual space outside them. This formulation provides
               a geometrically grounded interpretation of rubric-based scoring
               while enabling end-to-end training with standard transformer encoders.
               We introduce three distinct architectural variants and evaluate
               them on multiple short-answer and essay scoring datasets. Across
               these tasks, AGRAA achieves predictive performance highly competitive
               with strong neural and feature-based baselines. In addition, the
               framework yields interpretable intermediate representations that
               expose which rubric-defined aspects contribute to scoring decisions,
               enabling decision-aligned explanations grounded in rubric descriptors.}
}

Sebastian Gombert, Gianluca Romano, Leon Camus, Daniel Baumartz, Fabiola Gonçalves Ribeiro, Alexander Mehler and Hendrik Drachsler. 2026. NeoBridge: A Scalable Platform for Assessment Orchestration and Log Data Collection in Online Reasoning Assessments. Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning. accepted.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Gombert:et:al:2026:b,
  author    = {Gombert, Sebastian and Romano, Gianluca and Camus, Leon and Baumartz, Daniel
               and Gon{\c{c}}alves Ribeiro, Fabiola and Mehler, Alexander and Drachsler, Hendrik},
  title     = {{NeoBridge}: A Scalable Platform for Assessment Orchestration
               and Log Data Collection in Online Reasoning Assessments},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Twenty-first European Conference on Technology
               Enhanced Learning},
  series    = {ECTEL 2026},
  address   = {Valencia, Spain},
  year      = {2026},
  keywords  = {core, core_c08},
  eventdate = {2026-09-14/2026-09-18},
  note      = {accepted}
}

New Publication at NALOMA 2026

We are pleased to inform you that the following paper has been accepted at the 6th NALOMA (NAtural Language Meets LOgic and MAchine Learning) workshop, co-located with ESSLLI from August 3–7 in Prague.

Leon Lukas Hammerla and Alexander Mehler. August, 2026. Negation in Reasoning Traces: Interpretable Signals of Correctness and Provenance. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Natural Language Meets Logic and Machine Learning (NALOMA), 19–39.
BibTeX
@inproceedings{Hammerla:Mehler:2026:b,
  title     = {Negation in Reasoning Traces: Interpretable Signals of Correctness
               and Provenance},
  author    = {Hammerla, Leon Lukas and Mehler, Alexander},
  editor    = {Yanaka, Hitomi and Abzianidze, Lasha},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Natural Language Meets Logic
               and Machine Learning ({NALOMA})},
  month     = {aug},
  year      = {2026},
  address   = {Prague, Czechia},
  publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
  url       = {https://aclanthology.org/2026.naloma-1.4/},
  pages     = {19--39},
  isbn      = {979-8-89176-389-0},
  abstract  = {Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is widely used in large language
               models (LLMs), but the resulting reasoning traces remain underexplored.We
               study these traces through the lens of discourse-level negation.Specifically,
               we distinguish between corrective negation, which rejects a prior
               reasoning step, and refining negation, which narrows or qualifies
               it, and introduce metrics to quantify their use in human- and
               LLM-authored reasoning traces.Across multiple benchmarks, we find
               that negation occurs much more frequently in intermediate reasoning
               traces than in final response texts.We then test whether negation-based
               features provide predictive and descriptive signal for correctness,
               model identity, and human-vs.-LLM authorship.For correctness prediction,
               negation-based features consistently outperform simple structural
               baselines and in several settings add complementary signal to
               embedding-based representations, although embeddings remain stronger
               overall.In a controlled comparison on correct human and LLM traces
               from the same dataset, our strongest results arise in human-vs.-LLM
               classification, where negation features outperform both structural
               and embedding baselines.Overall, these findings position discourse-level
               negation as an interpretable feature for reasoning-trace analysis,
               with especially strong utility for provenance-related classification
               and modest but consistent value for correctness prediction.}
}